patent agent co ltd
While a number of issues are currently in the United States, one of the most controversial is that the right to privacy. This hot button issue in a complex environment after 9-11. We are fighting for and maintaining a balance between personal rights and public safety.
Most people would vigorously defend the right to privacy, feeling that too much access to personal data is not only an invasion, but morally wrong and unconstitutional. After all, before the 11th September, in the United States has not yet been subjected to terrorism plagued the open, in other countries.
The events of 11 September pervaded our false sense of security and really caused us if the enemy was in a distant country, or our neighbor next door. In our post 09/11 world, the Government's responsibility to protect the Americans, the new meaning. In an aggressive effort to protect us from the threat within the government has a "by all means necessary" approach, even if that means listening to phone calls, read e-mails, checking library records or cleaning agents with websites. The recent foiled airline bomb plot attacks in Britain is an example of how the violation of privacy may, in fact, to ensure that we are safe. The people stopped for this heinous crime was only through a tip, but the second one from the police to monitor private activities, including phone calls.
In the instance where an act is, by terrorism, because the violation of privacy can be no argument for the validity of the practice. But we also know that innocent people have their privacy invaded if they do not pose a threat to national security.
The national debate over privacy has an impact on a smaller level. Companies and employees struggle with the protection of privacy in the workplace. Companies are also in search of himself from another kind of terrorism - that the legal and financial burden caused by the actions of employees, whether deliberate or malicious innocent.
Privacy is legally protected by the Constitution of the United States, and at the core of American existence. As politicians, voters and special interest groups debate these constitutional questions, the employees and employers are trying to the rules for the use in businesses.
Does an employee have the right to privacy at work? How far can employers go in monitoring the activities of employees to ensure that they are protected from liability?
Employers not only have a right to monitor the activities of the employees, but a responsibility. Computer, including e-mails and phone calls can be monitored by the employer. In fact, a certain degree of monitoring is recommended. E-mails are evident in legal action shall inform the employer at a high level of risk. Even if the employer has a policy that explicitly states that the personal e-mails are admissible, the company is still a law on surveillance of individual e-mails.
Calls, except those that are for personal use "phones that can also be monitored. Call center and customer service employees are regularly monitored for quality assurance and training. There are, however, federal and state regulations must be observed in many places, including notifying parties that the call is monitored. Most employees will have a personal talk or from work at any given time. However, as a best practice employees should telephones or cell phones if they have personal business during the work day.
As we strive to ensure the privacy and the protection on a national stage, we will certainly be adjustments on a personal level. We have already become accustomed to much of our lives monitored by security cameras, electronic tracking and internet usage, it is possible that what is now the invasion is simply normal. In the meantime, it is prudent to assume that what happens in Vegas, can not be in Vegas!
Richard A. Hall is founder and president / CEO of LexTech, Inc., a legal information consulting company. Mr. Hall has a unique breadth of experience that enabled him to meld technology and sophisticated statistical analysis, a technology driven analytical model of the practice of law. As the process employed civilian lawyer, he was responsible for designing and implementing a LAN-based process database and fully automated document production for a medium-sized enterprises civil. He developed a task billing model based on extensive statistical analysis of hundreds of litigated civil matters. In 1994, Mr. Hall invented linguistic modeling software which automatically reads, applies budget codes, budget codes and analyzes legal bill content. He also served as California Director and lecturer for a nationwide bar review. Mr. Hall continues to practice law and perform pro bono services for several Northern California judicial districts.
0 ความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น